A Civil Action (1998)
Tony Abbot is known to be right wing. Then why did he take action against the one nation party?
Both are very right wing in their views why would Abbott?
“In 1998, Abbott established a trust fund called “Australians for Honest Politics Trust” to help bankroll civil court cases against the One Nation party and its founders, Pauline Hanson and David Ettridge.[15] Prosecution ultimately resulted in Hanson & Ettridge being imprisoned.[16] The conviction against Hanson was ultimately overturned, leading to criticism of a range of politicians for political interference by the adjudicating justice.
As Minister for Health and Ageing, Abbott introduced the Medicare Safety Net to cap the annual out-of-pocket costs of Medicare cardholders to a maximum amount. In 2007 he attracted criticism over long delays in funding for cancer diagnostic equipment (PET scanners).[17][18][19][20]”
Yes, Tony Abbott is currently our major “right wing” party leader, but his conservative policies still tread carefully close to centre. In the past, minor right wing parties have appeared and disappeared again, many of them with some extreme religious views or policies on immigration. Pauline Hanson was the first major direct threat that the Liberal/National coalition had – her views were essentially mainstream right wing that attracted a HUGE share of primary votes (which meant fewer votes going to the Liberal party). It wasn’t Labor voters generally supporting Hanson, but right wing Liberal supporters.
With the help of left-wing leaning media, Tony Abbott was “pushed” by John Howard to get rid of the threat – and a claim of electoral funding fraud was the way they did it. Although the allegations were later determined to be false, the negative attention was enough to give the One Nation party a big hit in the polls – and they never re-gained the success they briefly enjoyed. There were many claims in the media, claiming that Ms Hanson was racist but that was was using selected quotes out of context. There was nothing Pauline Hanson actually said that could be called racist by any reasonable person.
A Civil Action (1998)
|
|
A Civil Action
$5.66 Knockout true-life courtroom drama starring John Travolta as accident lawyer Jan Schlictmann, who takes on the owners of a tannery he believes are responsible for the leukemia deaths of several children. Because the tannery is owned by a large corporation, the case threatens to bankrupt Travolta's law firm. With Robert Duvall, William H. Macy, Kathleen Quinlan and John Lithgow. 115 min. Widescreen... |
|
|
GI Joe Timeless Colleciton General Robert E. Lee
$69.99 12" figure and accessories.... |
|
|
Microsoft Flight Simulator 98/World of Flight 98
$7.45 The world leader in flight simulation for the PC pushes technology and realism beyond the horizon. With a global database of scenery and airports, pilot-tested flight models, detailed instrument panelThe world leader in flight simulation for the PC pushes technology and realism beyond the horizon. With a global database of scenery and airports, pilot-tested flight models, detailed instrument panel... |
|
|
A Civil Action
$4.15 In America, when somebody does you wrong, you take 'em to court. W. R. Grace and Beatrice Foods had been dumping a cancer-causing industrial solvent into the water table of Woburn, Massachusetts, for years; in 1981, the families of eight leukemia victims sued. However, A Civil Action demonstrates powerfully that--even with the families' hotshot lawyers and the evidence on their side--justice... |
|
|
Thurgood Marshall: American Revolutionary
$5.87 Washington Post correspondent and TV commentator Juan Williams has produced an illuminating look at a true giant of 20th-century American politics. Williams retells the story of Thurgood Marshall's successful desegregation of public schools in the U.S. with his victory in the case of Brown v. Board of Education, followed by his appointment to the Supreme Court in 1967 for a 24-year term. But... |

